4.5 Article

The decline in skeletal muscle mass with aging is mainly attributed to a reduction in type II muscle fiber size

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 492-498

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.012

关键词

Sarcopenia; Atrophy; Exercise training; Hypertrophy; Type II muscle fibers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The loss of skeletal muscle mass with aging has been attributed to a decline in muscle fiber number and muscle fiber size. Objective: To define to what extent differences in leg muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) between young and elderly men are attributed to differences in muscle fiber size. Methods: Quadriceps muscle CSA and type I and type II muscle fiber size were measured in healthy young (n = 25; 23 +/- 1y) and older (n = 26; 71 +/- 1y) men. Subsequently, the older subjects performed 6 months of resistance type exercise training, after which measurements were repeated. Differences in quadriceps muscle CSA were compared with differences in type I and type II muscle fiber size. Results: Quadriceps CSA was substantially smaller in older versus young men (68 +/- 2 vs 80 +/- 2 cm(2), respectively; P < 0.001). Type II muscle fiber size was substantially smaller in the elderly vs the young (29%; P < 0.001), with a tendency of smaller type I muscle fibers (P = 0.052). Differences in type II muscle fiber size fully explained differences in quadriceps CSA between groups. Prolonged resistance type exercise training in the elderly increased type II muscle fiber size by 24 +/- 8% (P < 0.01), explaining 100 +/- 3% of the increase in quadriceps muscle CSA (from 68 +/- 2 to 74 +/- 2 cm(2)). Conclusion: Reduced muscle mass with aging is mainly attributed to smaller type II muscle fiber size and, as such, is unlikely accompanied by substantial muscle fiber loss. In line, the increase in muscle mass following prolonged resistance type exercise training can be attributed entirely to specific type II muscle fiber hypertrophy. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据