4.5 Article

Polyethylene glycol induced mouse model of retinal degeneration

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 143-152

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.021

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; retinal degeneration; mouse model; pathology

资金

  1. Department of Ophthalmology Research foundation
  2. Pat & Willard Walker Eye Research Center, Jones Eye Institute, Little Rock, AR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness. This study was done to characterize dry AMD-like changes in mouse retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and retina after polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment. We injected male C57BL/6 mice subretinally with PBS, 0.025, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg of PEG-400 and the animals were sacrificed on day 5. Eyes were harvested and processed for histological analysis. In all other experiments 0.5 mg PEG was injected and animals were sacrificed on days 1, 3, 5 or 14. Paraffin, 5 mu m and plastic, 1 pm and 80 nm sections were used for further analysis. Subretinal injection of 0.5 mg PEG induced a 32% reduction of outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness, 61% decrease of photoreceptor outer and inner segment length, 49% decrease of nuclear density in the ONL and 31% increase of RPE cell density by day 5 after injection. The maximum level of TUNEL positive nuclei in the ONL (6.8 + 1.99%) was detected at day 5 after PEG injection and co-localized with Casp3act. Histological signs of apoptosis were observed in the ONL by light or electron microscopy. Degeneration of RPE cells was found in PEG injected eyes. Gene expression data identified several genes reported to be involved in human AMD. C3, Cfi, Serping1, Mmp9, Htra1 and Lpl were up-regulated in PEG injected eyes compared to PBS controls. PEG leads to morphological and gene expression changes in RPE and retina consistent with dry AMD. This model will be useful to investigate dry AMD pathogenesis and treatment. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据