4.7 Article

Placental Growth Factor as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with CKD from the NARA-CKD Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 2871-2881

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2014080772

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  2. Takeda Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Placental growth factor (PIGF) contributes to atherogenesis through vascular inflammation and plaque destabilization. High levels of PIGF may be associated with mortality and cardiovascular disease, but the relationship between PIGF level and adverse outcomes in patients with CKD is unclear. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1351 consecutive participants with CKD enrolled in the Novel Assessment of Risk management for Atherosclerotic diseases in CKD (NARA-CKD) study between April 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011. During a median follow-up of 3 years, 199 participants died and 383 had cardiovascular events, defined as atherosclerotic disease or heart failure requiring hospitalization. In adjusted analyses, mortality and cardiovascular risk increased in each successive quartile of serum PIGF level; hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [95% asp for mortality and cardiovascular risk, respectively, were 1.59 (0.83 to 3.16) and 1.55 (0.92 to 2.66) for the second quartile, 2.97 (1.67 to 5.59) and 3.39 (2.20 to 5.41) for the third quartile, and 3.87 (2.24 to 7.08) and 8.42 (5.54 to 13.3) for the fourth quartile. The composite end point of mortality and cardiovascular events occurred during the study period in 76.4% of patients in both the highest PIGF quartile (19.6 pg/ml) and the lowest eGFR tertile (<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The association between sPIGF and mortality or cardiovascular events was not attenuated when participants were stratified by age, sex, traditional risk factors, and eGFR. These data suggest elevated PIGF is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据