4.5 Article

Effect of estrogen on electroretinographic responses in streptozotocin-induced diabetic female rats

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
卷 90, 期 5, 页码 591-597

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2010.02.003

关键词

full-field ERG; STZ-induced diabetic rat; estrogen deficiency; rat retina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of estrogen on functional changes in the retinas of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats by using an electroretinography. Female rats were randomly divided into four treatment groups: (1) Control (sham operation and vehicle administration); (2) STZ (sham operation and STZ administration); (3) OVX (ovariectomy and vehicle administration); and (4) OVX + STZ (ovariectomy and STZ administration). Full-field electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded before OVX and STZ administration and 4 and 12 weeks after STZ administration. At 4 weeks after STZ administration, although there were no differences in the STZ and OVX groups compared with the Control group, the amplitude of the cone-response was significantly lower in the OVX + STZ group than in the Control group (P = 0.013). At 12 weeks after STZ administration, this response showed a similar tendency in the STZ and the OVX + STZ groups. At 12 weeks after STZ administration, the implicit times of OP3 and OP4 and of the cone-response were significantly delayed in the STZ and OVX + STZ groups (OP3: P = 0.030 and 0.050, OP4: P = 0.0060 and 0.0053, cone-response: P = 0.014 and 0.039), compared with in the Control group. Thus, the retinal functions in STZ-induced diabetic female rats were aggravated by OVX. OVX-induced estrogen deficiency resulted in earlier changes in the amplitudes of cone-response, especially in the diabetes, although this is a transient effect and it is difficult to explain. Recognizing the early neurosensory change would enable a better understanding of the effect of estrogen in the retina. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据