4.6 Article

Evidence for a regulatory loop between IFN- and IL-33 in skin inflammation

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 102-107

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/exd.12076

关键词

atopic dermatitis; IFN-gamma; IL-33; inflammation; keratinocytes

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GRK144/1]
  2. Royal Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin-33 has recently gained much attention due to its role in allergic responses. It has been shown to amplify Th2 responses and to act as a damage-associated molecular pattern. IL-33 acts on a broad range of cells and has been proposed to link innate and adaptive features of allergic responses. It was the aim of this study to investigate this property of IL-33 in the inflammatory response characterising atopic dermatitis (AD). We have analysed the response of skin-resident cells derived from patients with AD and healthy donors with regard to the expression of IL-33 and its receptor ST2. The functional impact of IL-33 on CD4+ T cells was investigated. Keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts clearly differ in their regulation of IL-33. In fibroblasts, the concerted action of TNF- and IL-1 was the strongest inducer, whereas IFN- is clearly the key molecule that upregulates IL-33 in keratinocytes with a more pronounced response of cells derived from patients with AD. Keratinocytes from patients with AD showed a markedly higher constitutive expression level of surface ST2. CD4+ T cells respond to IL-33. Unexpectedly, IL-33 failed to induce a significant secretion of IL-5 or IL-13. By contrast, high amounts of IFN- were detectable if IL-33 was added to the T-cell receptor-stimulated cells or in combination with IL-12. These results suggest that IL-33 and IFN- are closely interlinked in epidermal AD inflammation. IFN- induces IL-33 in keratinocytes and IL-33 acts on activated T cells to further increase the release of IFN-, therefore contributing to drive skin inflammation towards chronic responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据