4.6 Article

IL-1 signalling determines the fate of skin grafts expressing non-self protein in keratinocytes

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 723-729

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01092.x

关键词

IL-1; IL-1Ra; skin; skin grafts; T cells

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [351439]
  2. Cancer Council Australia
  3. Cancer Research Institute (New York)
  4. AUSAID
  5. Lions Medical Research Fellowship
  6. Queensland Government
  7. Arthritis Queensland
  8. ARC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although IL-1 is a known inflammatory cytokine during pathogen infection, the role of IL-1 in skin graft rejection, particularly where foreign antigen is expressed exclusively in keratinocytes, is less understood. Here, we use a syngeneic skin graft system, where antigens are expressed in epithelial cells via either a keratin 14 or keratin 5 promoter, to explore the role of IL-1 in graft rejection and induction of epithelial antigen-specific effector CD8+ T-cell function. Keratin 5 ovalbumin (K5mOVA) transgenic skin grafts destined for rejection demonstrated increased expression of IL-1 beta and its receptors compared to K14 HPV16 E7 transgenic grafts that do not reject spontaneously. Rejection of OVA grafts lacking the IL-1 receptor (IL-1R1) was delayed and associated with decreased numbers of antigen-specific CD8 T cells. In contrast, K14E7 grafts survived on immunocompetent, syngeneic recipients with decreased graft levels of IL-1 beta and IL-1R1 and 2. However, in the absence of the IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-1Ra, skin grafts were spontaneously rejected and an E7-specific CD8 T-cell response was primed. Thus, expression of the HPV16E7 oncoprotein in epithelial cells prevents IL-1 beta-associated skin graft rejection and induction of antigen-specific CD8 T-cell responses. Enhancing IL-1 beta signalling, via blocking of the IL-1 receptor antagonist, may represent an alternative strategy for treatment of HPV16E7-associated cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据