4.6 Review

The vitamin D pathway: a new target for control of the skin's immune response?

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 633-639

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00768.x

关键词

1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3; alarmins; antimicrobial peptides; atopic dermatitis; cathelicidin; histone acetylation; psoriasis; rosacea; skin

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI052453-07, R01 AI052453, R37 AI052453] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR052728, R01 AR052728-04] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surface of our skin is constantly challenged by a wide variety of microbial pathogens, still cutaneous infections are relatively rare. Within cutaneous innate immunity the production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) is a primary system for protection against infection. Many AMPs can be found on the skin, and these include molecules that were discovered for their antimicrobial properties, and other peptides and proteins first known for activity as chemokines, enzymes, enzyme inhibitors and neuropeptides. Cathelicidins were among the first familiesf of AMPs discovered on the skin. They are now known to have two distinct functions; they have direct antimicrobial activity and will initiate a host cellular response resulting in cytokine release, inflammation and angiogenesis. Dysfunction of cathelicidin is relevant in the pathogenesis of several cutaneous diseases including atopic dermatitis where cathelicidin induction is suppressed, rosacea, where cathelicidin peptides are abnormally processed to forms that induce cutaneous inflammation and a vascular response, and psoriasis, where a cathelicidin peptide can convert self-DNA to a potent stimulus of an autoinflammatory cascade. Recent work has unexpectedly identified vitamin D3 as a major factor involved in the regulation of cathelicidin expression. Therapies targeting the vitamin D3 pathway and thereby cathelicidin may provide new treatment modalities in the management of infectious and inflammatory skin diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据