4.6 Article

Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (cIAP-1) degradation by caspase 8 during TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 317, 期 1, 页码 107-116

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.10.005

关键词

Death receptors; Chemoresistance; Hepatobiliary cancer

资金

  1. NIH [R01 DK63947]
  2. Mayo Foundation
  3. [P30 DK84567]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK063947, K01DK079875, P30DK084567] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

INF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a potential chemotherapeutic agent with high selectivity for malignant cells Many tumors however are resistant to TRAIL cytotoxicity Although cellular inhibitors of apoptosis 1 and 2 (cIAP-1 and -2) are often over-expressed in cancers their role in mediating TRAIL resistance remains unclear Here we demonstrate that TRAIL-Induced apoptosis of liver cancer cells is associated with degradation of cIAP-1 and X-linked IAP (XIAP) whereas cIAP-2 remains unchanged Lower concentrations of TRAIL causing minimal or no apoptosis do not alter cIAP-1 or XIAP protein levels Silencing of cIAP-1 expression but not XIAP or cIAP-2 as well as co-treatment with a second mitochondrial activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetic (which results in rapid depletion of cIAP-1) sensitizes the cells to TRAIL TRAIL-induced loss of cIAP-1 and XIAP requires caspase activity In particular caspase 8 knockdown stabilizes both cIAP-1 and XIAP while caspase 9 knockdown prevents XIAP but not cIAP-1 degradation Cell-free experiments confirmed cIAP-1 is a substrate for caspase 8 with likely multiple cleavage sites These results suggest that TRAIL-mediated apoptosis proceeds through caspase 8-dependent degradation of cIAP-1 Targeted depletion of cIAP-1 by SMAC mimetics in conjunction with TRAIL may be beneficial for the treatment of human hepatobiliary malignancies (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据