4.6 Article

Unraveling the distinct distributions of VE- and N-cadherins in endothelial cells: A key role for p120-catenin

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 316, 期 16, 页码 2587-2599

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.06.015

关键词

Endothelial cells; VE-cadherin; N-cadherin; Cell junctions; P120(ctn); Cholesterol rafts

资金

  1. ligue nationale contre le cancer, comite de l'lsere

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endothelial cells express two different classical cadherins, vascular endothelial (VE) cadherin and neural (N) cadherin, having distinct functions in the vascular system. VE-cadherin is specific to endothelial adherens junctions and is strictly necessary for vascular morphogenesis. On the contrary, N-cadherin shows diffuse localization on the cell surface and interacts with mural cells for vessel stabilization. In this study, we sought to clarify the cellular mechanisms leading to the distinct cellular locations and functions of the two cadherins in the endothelium. VE-cadherin has been shown to be responsible for the junctional exclusion of N-cadherin. Using several endothelial models, we demonstrate that this property is dependent on VE-cadherin binding to p120 catenin (p120(ctn)). Moreover, although in the absence of VE-cadherin N-cadherin can localize to cell contacts, angiogenesis remains impaired, demonstrating that endothelial junction formation is not sufficient for normal vessel development. Interestingly, we show that VE-cadherin, but not N-cadherin, is partially associated with cholesterol-enriched microdomains. Lipid raft-associated-VE-cadherin is characterized by a very high level of p120(ctn) association, and this association is necessary for VE-cadherin recruitment into lipid rafts. Altogether, our results indicate a critical role for p120(ctn) in regulating the membrane distribution of endothelial cadherins with functional consequences in terms of cadherin stabilization and intracellular signaling. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据