4.6 Article

NBCn1 and NHE1 expression and activity in ΔNErbB2 receptor-expressing MCF-7 breast cancer cells: Contributions to pHi regulation and chemotherapy resistance

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 316, 期 15, 页码 2538-2553

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.06.005

关键词

Na+/H+ exchanger; Na+-HCO3- cotransporter; ErbB2; Chemotherapy; Programmed cell death

资金

  1. Danish National Research Council
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  3. Danish Cancer Society
  4. Niels Bohr Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Altered pH-regulatory ion transport is characteristic of many cancers; however, the mechanisms and consequences are poorly understood. Here, we investigate how a truncated, constitutively active ErbB2 receptor (Delta NErbB2) common in breast cancer impacts on the Na+/H+-exchanger NHE1 and the Na+,HCO3--cotransporter NBCn1 in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and address the roles of these transporters in chemotherapy resistance. Upon Delta NErbB2 expression, mRNA and protein levels of NBCn1, yet not of NHE1, increased several-fold, and the localization of both transporters was altered paralleling extensive morphological changes. The rate of pH, recovery after acid loading increased by 50% upon Delta NErbB2 expression. Knockdown and pharmacological inhibition confirmed the involvement of both NHE1 and NBCn1 in acid extrusion. NHE1 inhibition or knockdown sensitized Delta NErbB2-expressing cells to cisplatin-induced programmed cell death (PCD) in a caspase-, cathepsin-, and reactive oxygen species-dependent manner. NHE1 inhibition augmented cisplatin-induced caspase activity and lysosomal membrane permeability followed by cysteine cathepsin release. In contrast, NBCn1 inhibition attenuated cathepsin release and had no net effect on viability. These findings warrant studies of NHE1 as a potential target in breast cancer and demonstrate that in spite of their similar transport functions, NHE1 and NBCn1 serve different functions in MCF-7 cells. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据