4.6 Article

Proteomic analysis of the nuclear matrix in the early stages of rat liver carcinogenesis: Identification of differentially expressed and MAR-binding proteins

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 315, 期 2, 页码 226-239

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.10.017

关键词

Nuclear Matrix; Matrix Attachment Regions; Proteomics; Hepatocytes; Persistent hepatocyte nodules; Heterogeneous nuclear; ribonuclearproteins; Lamins; Nuclear mitotic apparatus protein

资金

  1. Ministero della Salute
  2. Compagnia San Paolo, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor progression is characterized by definite changes in the protein composition of the nuclear matrix (NM). The interactions of chromatin with the NM Occur via specific DNA sequences called MARS (matrix attachment regions). In the present study, we applied a proteomic approach along with a Southwestern assay to detect both differentially expressed and MAR-binding NM proteins, in persistent hepatocyte nodules (PHN) in respect with normal hepatocytes (NH). In PHN, the NM undergoes changes both in morphology and in protein composition. We detected over 500 protein spots in each two dimensional map and 44 spots were identified. Twenty-three proteins were differentially expressed; among these, 15 spots were under-expressed and 8 spots were over-expressed in PHN compared to NH. These changes were synchronous with several modifications in both NM morphology and the ability of NM proteins to bind nuclear RNA and/or DNA containing MARS sequences. In PHN, we observed a general decrease in the expression of the basic proteins that bound nuclear RNA and the over-expression of two species of Mw 135 kDa and 81 kDa and pl 6.7-7.0 and 6.2-7.4, respectively, which exclusively bind to MARS. These results suggest that the deregulated expression of these species might be related to large-scale chromatin reorganization observed in the process of carcinogenesis by modulating the interaction between MARs and the scaffold structure. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据