4.6 Article

Ruestoring wtp53 activity in HIPK2 depleted MCF7 cells by modulating metallothionein and zinc

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 315, 期 1, 页码 67-75

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.10.018

关键词

HIPK2; p53 conformation; Metallothioneins; MT2A; Zinc; Adriamycin; Conditional-RNA interference; Breast cancer; Combined chemotherapy

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC)
  2. Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (FIRC)
  3. Wolfson Family Charitable Trust on Tumor Cell Diversity
  4. FAMRI Center of Excellence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The maintenance of p53 transactivation activity is important for p53 apoptotic function. We have shown that stable knockdown of HIPI2 induces p53 misfolding with inhibition of p53 target gene transcription. In this study we established a lentiviral-based system for doxycyclin (Dox)-induced Conditional interference of HIPK2 expression to evaluate the molecular mechanisms involved in p53 deregulation. We found that HIPK2 knockdown induced metallothionein 2A (MT2A) upregulation as assessed by RT-PCR analysis, increased promoter acetylation, and increased promoter luciferase activity. The MT2A upregulation correlated with resistance to Adriamycin (ADR)-driven apoptosis and with p53 inhibition. Thus, acute knockdown of HIPK2 (HIPK2i) induced misfolded p53 protein in MCF7 breast cancer cells and inhibited p53 DNA-binding and transcription activities in response to ADR treatment. Previous works show that MT may modulate p53 activity through zinc exchange. Here, we found that inhibition of MT2A expression by siRNA in the HIPK2i cells restored p53 transcription activity. Similarly zinc supplementation to HIPK2i cells restored p53 transcription activity and drug-induced apoptosis. These data support the notion that MT2A is involved in p53 deregulation and strengthen the possibility that combination of chemotherapy and zinc might be useful to treat tumors with inactive wtp53. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据