4.6 Article

Tumor cell migration and invasion are regulated by expression of variant integrin glycoforms

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 314, 期 16, 页码 2941-2950

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.07.021

关键词

ras; integrin; sialic acid; metastasis; collagen; colonocytes

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA84248]
  2. Mizutani Foundation for Glycoscience
  3. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ST6Gal-I glycosyltransferase, which adds alpha 2-6-linked sialic acids to glycoproteins, is overexpressed in colon adenocarcinoma, and enzyme activity is correlated with tumor cell invasiveness. Previously we reported that forced expression of oncogenic ras in HD3 colonocytes causes upregulation of ST6Gal-I, leading to increased alpha 2-6 sialylation of beta 1 integrins. To determine whether ras-induced sialylation is involved in promoting the tumor cell phenotype, we used shRNA to downregulate ST6Gal-I in ras-expressors, and then monitored integrin-dependent responses. Here we show that forced ST6Gal-I downregulation, leading to diminished alpha 2-6 sialylation of integrins, inhibits cell adhesion to Collagen 1, a beta 1 ligand. Correspondingly, collagen binding is reduced by enzymatic removal of cell surface sialic acids from ras-expressors with high ST6Gal-I levels (i.e., no shRNA). Cells with forced ST6Gal-I downregulation also exhibit decreased migration on collagen I and diminished invasion through Matrigel. Importantly, GD25 cells, which lack beta 1 integrins (and ST6Gal-I), do not demonstrate differential invasiveness when forced to express ST6Gal-I, suggesting that the effects of variant sialylation are mediated specifically by beta 1 integrins. The observation that cell migration and invasion can be blocked in oncogenic ras-expressing cells by forcing ST6Gal-I downregulation implicates differential sialylation as an important ras effector, and also suggests that ST6Gal-I is a promising therapeutic target. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据