4.4 Article

ENU Mutagenesis Screening for Dominant Behavioral Mutations Based on Normal Control Data Obtained in Home-Cage Activity, Open-Field, and Passive Avoidance Tests

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 495-510

出版社

INT PRESS EDITING CENTRE INC
DOI: 10.1538/expanim.59.495

关键词

behavior; ENU; mice; mutagenesis; mutants

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To establish the cutoff values for screening ENU-induced behavioral mutations, normal variations in mouse behavioral data were examined in home-cage activity (HA), open-field (OF), and passive-avoidance (PA) tests. We defined the normal range as one that included more than 95% of the normal control values. The cutoffs were defined to identify outliers yielding values that deviated from the normal by less than 5% for C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, DBF1, and N-2 (DXDB) progenies. Cutoff values for G1-phenodeviant (DBF1) identification were defined based on values over +/- 3.0 SD from the mean of DBF1 for all parameters assessed in the HA and OF tests. For the PA test, the cutoff values were defined based on whether the mice met the learning criterion during the 2nd (at a shock intensity of 0.3 mA) or the 3rd (at a shock intensity of 0.15 mA) retention test. For several parameters, the lower outliers were undetectable as the calculated cutoffs were negative values. Based on the cutoff criteria, we identified 275 behavioral phenodeviants among 2,646 G1 progeny. Of these, 64 were crossed with wild-type DBA/2J individuals, and the phenotype transmission was examined in the G2 progeny using the cutoffs defined for N-2 mice. In the G2 mice, we identified 15 novel dominant mutants exhibiting behavioral abnormalities, including hyperactivity in the HA or OF tests, hypoactivity in the OF test, and PA deficits. Genetic and detailed behavioral analysis of these ENU-induced mutants will provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据