3.9 Article

Kidney antioxidant status, biochemical parameters and histopathological changes induced by methomyl in CD-1 mice

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 897-901

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2013.01.002

关键词

Methomyl; Lipid peroxidation; Antioxidant enzymes; Kidney; Histopathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread of pesticide in public health and agriculture has caused severe environmental pollution and health hazards. Methomyl is used worldwide in agriculture and health programs. Besides its advantages in the agriculture, it causes several toxic effects. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of methomyl at different time intervals on lipid peroxidation, reduced glutathione (GSH), total sulfhydryl group (T-SH), antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and histopathological changes in mice kidney. Ten CD-1 mice per group were assigned to one of four treatment groups. Group one served as control while groups 2,3 and 4 were orally treated with 1 mg methomyl/kg BW for 10, 20 and 30 days, respectively. Methomyl significantly increased lipid peroxidation in kidney as compared to control group. Levels of GSH and T-SH and activities of SOD, CAT and GST were found to be decreased. On the other hand, methomyl significantly increased the levels of urea, uric acid and creatinine in serum. The histological examination of kidney revealed damage involving the entire renal nephrons in both 20 and 30 days of methomyl exposure. Severe dilatation of the cortical tissue, congested glomerulus with swelling of the endothelial cells and degeneration of the epithelium cells lining the tubules were observed. In conclusion, the results suggest that methomyl exposure can cause renal damage, oxidative stress, perturbations in antioxidant defense system and histopathologic changes in mice kidney in a time dependent manner. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据