3.9 Article

Histopathological features of the brain, liver, kidney and spleen following an innovative polytrauma model of the mouse

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 64, 期 3, 页码 133-139

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2010.07.007

关键词

Brain injury; Controlled cortical impact; Fracture; Mouse; Neuroprotection; Neurotrauma; Polytrauma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object: Among the various introduced experimental traumatic brain injury models, there is a clear paucity of proper experimental polytrauma models. To overcome this experimental gap we introduced such a polytrauma model in the mouse including traumatic brain injury. Here, we report on the histopathological features of the brain, lung, kidney, spleen and liver. Materials and methods: 20 male C57BL mice with a mean weight of 23 g were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine. The anaesthetized animals were subjected to a controlled cortical impact (CCI) over the left parieto-temporal cortex using rounded-tip impounder for application of a standardized brain injury. Following fracture of the right femur using a guillotine, a volume-controlled hemorrhagic shock was induced. The control groups included animals with CCI only (n = 20) and animals with femur fracture plus hemorrhagic shock without CCI (n = 20). Subjects were sacrified at 96h following trauma. Brain, lung, kidney, spleen and liver of the animals underwent histopathological examinations. Results: The mortality rate at 96 h was 25% in the polytrauma group versus 10% in the control groups. Within the histopathological investigations, polytraumatized animals differ from those with a single trauma (traumatic brain injury or femur fracture with hemorrhagic shock) with various severity. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that such a polytrauma model can be standardized resulting in a reproducible damage. This model fulfills the requirements of a standardized animal model. It allows adequate analogies and inferences to the clinical situation of a polytrauma in humans. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据