3.9 Article

Hypoglycemic activity of Buchholzia coriacea (Capparaceae) seeds in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats and mice

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 63, 期 7-8, 页码 619-625

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2010.05.002

关键词

Buchholzia coriacea; Diabetes; Hepatotoxicity; Oxidative stress; Streptozotocin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study evaluates the possible hypoglycemic activity and ameliorative effects of oral administration of ethanol extracts (EEBC) and butanol fraction (BFBC) of Buchholzia coriacea seeds, a plant in use traditionally for treating diabetes, hypertension, rheumatism, cold, cough and catarrh, in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice and rats. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were evaluated before and after extracts administration. EEBC and BFBC significantly decreased (P < 0.05) FBG in hyperglycemic mice and normoglycemic rats within 4 and 12 h, respectively after extract administration. The administration of EEBC, BFBC and glibenclamide (a standard antidiabetic drug) for 10 days significantly lowered (P< 0.05) FBG level in STZ-induced diabetic rats by 55%, 64% and 56%, respectively. EEBC and BFBC significantly (P< 0.05) decreased hepatic injury induced by STZ as evident in the decreased activity of serum alanine amino transferase and aspartate amino transferase compared to in the STZ-only treated group. Similarly, both extracts significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the elevated levels of serum creatinine, urea, total cholesterol, triglyceride and thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) products in diabetic rats. Serum superoxide dismutase activity was significantly enhanced (P < 0.05) by treatments with EEBC, BFBC and glibenclamide. Overall, the results suggest that B. coriacea seeds contain a potent hypoglycemic and antioxidant agent suggested to be a flavone glycoside concentrated in BFBC which may find clinical application in amelioration of diabetes-induced secondary complications. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据