3.9 Article

Clinico-hematological and micronuclear changes induced by cypermethrin in broiler chicks: Their attenuation with vitamin E and selenium

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 333-341

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2009.05.002

关键词

Cypermethrin; Broiler chicks; Clinical signs; Weight loss; Anemia; Micronucleus; Vitamin E; Selenium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was carried out on 90 one-day-old broiler chicks to know clinico-hematological alterations, DNA damage caused by cypermethrin (CY), and attenuation of toxic effects by vitamin E (Vit E) and selenium (Se). Birds were randomly divided into five equal groups. Groups 1-4 received CY (600 ml kg(-1) b.wt) daily for 30 days by crop tubing. In addition to CY, groups 2, 3 and 4 received Vit E (150 mg kg(-1) b.wt) + Se (0.25 mg kg(-1) b.wt), and Vit E (150 mg kg(-1) b.wt) + Se (0.25 mg kg(-1) b.wt), respectively. Group 5 served as control. Birds were monitored twice daily for clinical signs. They were weighed and blood samples were collected at experimental days 10, 20 and 30 for hematological studies. CY-treated birds showed more prominent signs of toxicity compared to CY + Vit E, CY + Se and CY + Vit E + Se birds. Body weight in groups 1-3 was significantly (P<0.05) smaller at days 20 and 30 when compared with the control group. Significantly (P<0.001) higher numbers of micronuclei appeared in chicks treated with CY compared to CY + Vit E- and CY + Se-treated birds. Significantly decreased total erythrocyte counts (TEC), hemoglobin (Hb) concentration and packed cell volume (PCV) in all treated groups were recorded. Treated birds suffered from macrocytic hypochromic anemia. Leukocytosis in early stage and later leucopenia was seen in treated birds. It can be concluded that CY induces toxic effects in broilers chicks; however, these toxic effects can be ameliorated by Vit E or Se. Combination of Vit E and Se was more effective to ameliorate toxic effects of cypermethrin. (C) 2009 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据