3.9 Article

Use of rasH2 transgenic mice for carcinogenesis testing of medical implants

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 61, 期 5, 页码 433-441

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2008.10.008

关键词

Carcinogenicity; Transgenic; rasH2; Medical device; Animal model; Mouse; Pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several transgenic mice models Lire accepted by regulatory agencies to determine the carcinogenic potential and predict the human response to exposure of chemicals, as an alternative to the conventional 2-year rodent bioassay. The rasH2 transgenic mouse model has been proposed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of medical devices, but few data are currently available regarding study design - namely appropriate positive and negative controls to be used - as well Lis historical pathology data. BIOMATECH-NAMSA recently conducted a 26-week carcinogenicity study following subcutaneous implantation in the transgenic rasH2 mouse model. This paper describes the study design and the main results obtained in the positive and negative control groups. The survival rate statistical (Kaplan-Meler) analysis showed that the Survival rate was significantly affected by the occurrence of tumors in the positive control group when compared to the negative control group, in both genders. Thymic malignant lymphomas and squamous Cell papillomas were reported to occur at a higher incidence in rasH2 mice exposed to a known chemical carcinogen, for terminally sacrificed animals as well as for unscheduled and terminally sacrificed animals considered together. Background and age-related lesions were few. Taken together, these data confirmed the reliability and usefulness of the rasH2 transgenic model in the assessment of carcinogenic properties of medical devices. A major beneficial property of this animal model consisted in the ability to demonstrate chemical carcinogenesis response without the solid-state tumorigenesis response seen in traditional 2-year rodent bioassays. (C) 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据