4.5 Article

Significance of hyaluronan binding protein (HABP1/P32/gC1qR) expression in advanced serous ovarian cancer patients

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY
卷 94, 期 1, 页码 210-215

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.06.007

关键词

gC1qR; Ovarian cancer; Survival; Cisplatin; Chemotherapy resistance

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [D200858]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To evaluate various risk factors related to the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in 131 patients with stage III-IV ovarian serous carcinoma. Methods: All patients underwent primary debullring surgery followed by a standard chemotherapeutic treatment regimen. Hyaluronan binding protein (HABP1) expression was evaluated using immunohistochemical-staining and assessed using western-immunoblotting analyses. A log-rank test was used to compare OS and PFS between cisplatin sensitive versus resistant patients. Multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with OS and PFS. Results: HABP1 over-expression was correlated to histological-differentiation, residual-tumor-size, serum CA-125 levels and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that increased expression of HABP1 was associated with cisplatin resistance. HABP1 low-expression resulted in an increased five-year OS and PFS. Cox proportional hazards test identified that high expression of HABP1 led to increased risk for stage III/IV serous ovarian cancer via poor OS and PFS. This was similar for cisplatin resistant patients. Thus, increased HABP1 immunoreactivity in ovarian cancer may lead to a shortening in disease-free intervals of patients. Conclusion: HAPBP1 over-expression in primary ovarian carcinomas is related to a decrease in OS and PFS and may be utilized as a prognostic marker for stage III/IV patients. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据