4.7 Article

Sequential evolution of IL-17 responses in the early period of allograft rejection

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 707-716

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.3858/emm.2009.41.10.077

关键词

graft rejection; interleukin-17; neutrophils; T-lymphocytes, regulatory

资金

  1. Clinical Research Institute (CRI)
  2. Seoul National University Hospital [0620082780]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T (T-reg) cells which protect against autoimmune tissue injury, IL-17-producing CD4(+)T (T(h)17) cells have been recently described and shown to play a crucial role in autoimmune injury. It appears that there is a reciprocal developmental pathway between T(h)17 and T-reg cells. Although IL-17 is known to be associated with allograft rejection, the cellular source of IL-17 and the nature of T(h)17 in the context of allograft rejection remain unknown. In the current study, the dynamics of T-reg and IL-17-producing cells after syngeneic and allogeneic transplantation were examined using a wild-type murine cardiac transplantation model. Ly6G(+) cells were found to produce IL-17 during the early postoperative period and CD8(+) as well as CD4(+)T cells were also found to produce IL-17 during alloimmune response. Graft-infiltrating Ly6G(+), CD4(+), and even CD8(+) cells were found to express IL-17 highly compared to those in spleen. Although the frequencies of T(h)17 and T-reg were found to gradually increase in both syngeneic and allogeneic recipients, T(h)17/T-reg ratios were significantly higher in recipients with allograft rejection than in syngeneic recipients. In conclusion, IL-17 is produced by neutrophils during the early postoperative period and subsequently by T(h)17 and CD8(+) T cells during allograft rejection. T(h)17/T-reg imbalance is associated with the development of allograft rejection. This study would provide basic information on T(h)17 biology for future investigation in the field of transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据