4.1 Article

Diabetes Mellitus and Incidence and Mortality of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

期刊

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297969

关键词

diabetes mellitus; gastric neoplasm; epidemiology; meta-analysis

资金

  1. Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation in Health Department of Jiangsu Province [H201023]
  2. Health Department of Jiangsu Province [H200873]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Epidemiologic studies have examined the possible associations between diabetes mellitus (DM) and gastric cancer (GC), but the results are inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the evidence regarding the associations between diabetes and incidences of, or mortality from, gastric cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched up to Oct 20, 2011. We identified studies that included effects estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the associations between GC and diabetes. Summary RRs for the GC incidence and mortality were calculated using random-effects model; subgroup analyses were also performed. Heterogeneity among studies was examined using Q and I-2 statistics. Results: A total of 7 case-control and 18 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary RR showed a slightly statistical link between history of DM and GC incidence (nRR= 1.11, 95% Cl: 1.00-1.24, p=0.045, I-2=79.5%). In the subgroup analyses, a positive association was noted among the studies conducted in Asia (summary RR=1.19, 95% Cl: 1.07-1.32, I-2=29.8%). Additionally, slight associations between DM and GC were observed by pooling the data of type 2 DM, cohort studies and the studies controlling more confounders, respectively. Furthermore, mortality from GC with diabetes was increased compared with individuals without diabetes (summary RR=1.29, 95% Cl: 1.04-1.59). No publication bias was found. Conclusion: Individuals with diabetes have an increased risk of developing gastric cancer, and are positively associated with gastric cancer mortality. Large better-designed cohort studies are needed to verify this conclusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据