4.1 Article

The German Database on Hypopituitarism after Traumatic Brain Injury and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - Description, Objectives and Design

期刊

出版社

JOHANN AMBROSIUS BARTH VERLAG MEDIZINVERLAGE HEIDELBERG GMBH
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253414

关键词

traumatic brain injury; subarachnoid hemorrhage; hypopituitarism; growth hormone deficiency; database

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. Novo Nordisk
  3. Novartis
  4. Lilly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the last years, a number of clinical studies have addressed the topic of hypothalamo-pituitary dysfunction following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Clinical studies oftentimes reflect the investigation of highly selective patient groups, very standardized test procedures and may be influenced by a publication bias. Epidemiological data on the prevalence and incidence of hypopituitarism after TBI and SAH in the general population still do not exist. Moreover, very little is known about risk factors and clinical characteristics of pituitary impairment after brain damage. Epidemiologic surveys which aggregate information of many different treatment centers become an increasingly important means of bridging the gap between standardized study situations and clinical practice. Therefore, a multi-center, structured data assessment to create a national registry of TB! and SAH patients has been established in 2005. The Structured Data Assessment of Hypopituitarism after TBI and SAH is coordinated by the Department of Endocrinology, Max-Planck-Institute in Munich with participation of at present 13 neurosurgical, rehabilitation and endocrinological centers in Germany and one Austrian center. Within this database, a large scope of very detailed, clinical, endocrine and outcome information is collected. It also offers the possibility of long-term follow up of the recorded patients. This is the first report of the registry describing goals, organization, methodology, funding and the descriptive data of the first 1 242 patients entered until November 20(th), 2008.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据