4.3 Article

In Vitro Acetylcholinesterase-Inhibitory Properties of Enzymatic Hemp Seed Protein Hydrolysates

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11746-015-2779-0

关键词

Acetylcholinesterase; Amino acid composition; Hemp seed; Mass spectrometry; Peptides; Protein hydrolysate

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Manitoba Agri-Food Research and Development Initiative (ARDI) grant
  3. University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowship (UMGF)
  4. Manitoba Graduate Scholarship (MGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to characterize the structural and functional properties of hemp seed protein-derived acetylcholinesterase (AChE)-inhibitory enzymatic hydrolysates. Hemp seed protein isolate hydrolysis was performed using six different proteases (pepsin, papain, thermoase, flavourzyme, alcalase and pepsin + pancreatin) at different concentrations (1-4 %). The degree of hydrolysis was directly related to the amount of protease used but had no relationship with AChE-inhibitory activity. Amino acid composition results showed that the hemp seed protein hydrolysates (HPHs) had high levels of negatively charged amino acids (39.62-40.18 %) as well as arginine. The 1 % pepsin HPH was the most active AChE inhibitor with similar to 6 A mu g/mL IC50 value when compared to 8-11.6 A mu g/mL for the other HPHs. Mass spectrometry analysis showed that most of the peptides in all the hydrolysates were less than 1000 Da in size. However, the pepsin HPHs contained larger-sized peptides (244-1009 Da) than the papain HPHs (246-758 Da), which in turn was larger than the alcalase HPH (246-607 Da). The higher AChE-inhibitory effects of the pepsin HPHs may be due to increased synergistic effects from a wider peptide size range when compared to the papain and alcalase HPHs that had narrower ranges. The narrow peptide size range in the alcalase HPH confirms the higher efficiency of this protease in releasing small-sized peptides from food proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据