4.7 Article

Differential Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation Target on Motor Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 77, 期 4, 页码 710-719

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24374

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cooperative Studies Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development
  2. NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  3. Medtronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe Veterans Administration Cooperative Studies Program #468, a multicenter study that randomized Parkinson's disease (PD) patients to either subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS), found that stimulation at either target provided similar overall motoric benefits. We conducted an additional analysis of this data set to evaluate whether PD motor subtypes responded differently to the 2 stimulation targets. MethodsWe classified 235 subjects by motor subtype: tremor dominant (TD), intermediate (I), or postural instability gait difficulty (PIGD), based on pre-DBS baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores off-medication. The primary outcome was change in UPDRS part III (UPDRS-III) off-medication scores from baseline to 24 months post-DBS, compared among subjects with particular PD motor subtypes and by DBS target (STN vs GPi). Changes in tremor, rigidity, akinesia, and gait scores were also assessed using the UPDRS. ResultsTD patients had greater mean overall motor improvement, measured by UPDRS-III, after GPi DBS, compared to STN DBS (17.513.0 vs 14.6 +/- 14.9, p=0.02), with improvement in gait accounting for this difference. Regardless of stimulation target, PIGD subjects had lower mean overall improvement in UPDRS-III scores compared with I or TD subjects (8.7 +/- 12.2 vs 21.7 +/- 11.2 vs 16.3 +/- 13.8, p=0.001). InterpretationOur results suggest that responsiveness to both GPi and STN DBS is similar among different PD motor subtypes, although the TD motor subtype may have a greater response to GPi DBS with respect to gait. PIGD patients obtained less overall benefit from stimulation. Ann Neurol 2015;77:710-719

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据