4.3 Article

Periodic host absence can select for higher or lower parasite transmission rates

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 121-137

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-010-9387-0

关键词

Basic reproduction number; Damping-off; Potato blight; Season trade-off; Take-all; Virulence trade-off; Yellow rust

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) of the United Kingdom
  2. INRA-BBSRC
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004942, BB/E527163/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00004942, BB/E527163/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the effect of discontinuous periodic host absence on the evolution of pathogen transmission rates by using R-0 maximisation techniques. The physiological consequence of an increased transmission rate can be either an increased virulence, i.e. there is a transmission-virulence trade-off or ii) a reduced between season survival, i.e. there is a transmission-survival trade-off. The results reveal that the type of trade-off determines the direction of selection, with relatively longer periods of host absence selecting for higher transmission rates in the presence of a trade-off between transmission and virulence but lower transmission rates in the presence of a trade-off between transmission and between season survival. The fact that for the transmission-virulence trade-off both trade-off parameters operate during host presence whereas for the transmission-survival trade-off one operates during host presence (transmission) and the other (survival) during the period of host absence is the main cause for this difference in selection direction. Moreover, the period of host absence seems to be the key determinant of the pathogen's transmission rate. Comparing plant patho-systems with contrasting biological features suggests that airborne plant pathogens respond differently to longer periods of host absence than soil-borne plant pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据