4.6 Article

Genetic differentiation and recombination among geographic populations of the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum truncatum from chili peppers in China

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 108-118

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12233

关键词

clustering analyses; Colletotrichum truncatum; genetic differentiation; phylogeny; population structure; private alleles

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31272061]
  2. special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest [201003004, 201303023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colletotrichum truncatum is an extremely important fungal pathogen. It can cause diseases both in humans and in over 460 plant species. However, little is known about its genetic diversity within and among populations. One of the major plant hosts of C.truncatum is pepper, and China is one of the main pepper-producing countries in the world. Here, we propose the hypotheses that geography has a major influence on the relationships among populations of C.truncatum in China and that infections in different populations need to be managed differently. To test these hypotheses, we obtained and analyzed 266 C.truncatum isolates from 13 regions representing the main pepper-growing areas throughout China. The analysis based on nine microsatellite markers identified high intrapopulation genetic diversity, evidence of sexual recombination, and geographic differentiation. The genetic differentiation was positively correlated with geographic distance, with the southern and northern China populations grouped in two distinct clusters. Interestingly, isolates collected from the pepper-breeding center harbored the most private alleles. The results suggest that the geographic populations of C.truncatum on peppers in China are genetically differentiated and should be managed accordingly. Our study also provides a solid foundation from which to further explore the global genetic epidemiology of C.truncatum in both plants and humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据