4.6 Article

Discordant introgression in a rapidly expanding hybrid swarm

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 380-392

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00249.x

关键词

competition; Cyprinella; hybrid zone; introgression; invasive species; selection

资金

  1. US EPA
  2. Office of Naval Research (US Department of Defense)
  3. Tulane University
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1126516] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The erosion of species boundaries can involve rapid evolutionary change. Consequently, many aspects of the process remain poorly understood, including the formation, expansion, and evolution of hybrid swarms. Biological invasions involving hybridization present exceptional opportunities to study the erosion of species boundaries because timelines of interactions and outcomes are frequently well known. Here, we examined clinal variation across codominant and maternally inherited genetic markers as well as phenotypic traits to characterize the expansion and evolution of a hybrid swarm between native Cyprinella venusta and invasive Cyprinella lutrensis minnows. Discordant introgression of phenotype, microsatellite multilocus genotype, and mtDNA haplotype indicates that the observable expansion of the C.venusta X C.lutrensis hybrid swarm is a false invasion front. Both parental and hybrid individuals closely resembling C.lutrensis are numerically dominant in the expansion wake, indicating that the non-native parental phenotype may be selectively favored. These findings show that cryptic introgression can extend beyond the phenotypic boundaries of hybrid swarms and that hybrid swarms likely expand more rapidly than can be documented from phenotypic variation alone. Similarly, dominance of a single parental phenotype following an introduction event may lead to instances of species erosion being mistaken for species displacement without hybridization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据