4.6 Review

Underutilized resources for studying the evolution of invasive species during their introduction, establishment, and lag phases

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 203-219

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00101.x

关键词

biological control; evolution; horticultural invasion; invasive species; lag phase; natural history collections; specimens

资金

  1. US Geological Survey Biological Resources Discipline [04HQAG0135, 08HQAG0139]
  2. US Department of Agriculture [2007-55320-17847]
  3. US Department of Agriculture NRI-CSREES [2008-35302-04680]
  4. Academy of Finland [118456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The early phases of biological invasions are poorly understood. In particular, during the introduction, establishment, and possible lag phases, it is unclear to what extent evolution must take place for an introduced species to transition from established to expanding. In this study, we highlight three disparate data sources that can provide insights into evolutionary processes associated with invasion success: biological control organisms, horticultural introductions, and natural history collections. All three data sources potentially provide introduction dates, information about source populations, and genetic and morphological samples at different time points along the invasion trajectory that can be used to investigate preadaptation and evolution during the invasion process, including immediately after introduction and before invasive expansion. For all three data sources, we explore where the data are held, their quality, and their accessibility. We argue that these sources could find widespread use with a few additional pieces of data, such as voucher specimens collected at certain critical time points during biocontrol agent quarantine, rearing, and release and also for horticultural imports, neither of which are currently done consistently. In addition, public access to collected information must become available on centralized databases to increase its utility in ecological and evolutionary research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据