4.4 Article

Sex differences in visual attention toward infant faces

期刊

EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 280-287

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.04.001

关键词

Visual attention; Interest in infants; Human evolution; Sex differences

资金

  1. Michigan State University
  2. NSF [1203667]
  3. SBE Off Of Multidisciplinary Activities
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1203667] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parental care and alloparental care are major evolutionary dimensions of the biobehavioral repertoire of many species, including human beings. Despite their importance in the course of human evolution and the likelihood that they have significantly shaped human cognition, the nature of the cognitive mechanisms underlying alloparental care is still largely unexplored. In this study, we examined whether one such cognitive mechanism is a visual attentional bias toward infant features, and if so, whether and how it is related to the sex of the adult and the adult's self-reported interest in infants. We used eye-tracking to measure the eye movements of nulliparous undergraduates while they viewed pairs of faces consisting of one adult face (a man or woman) and one infant face (a boy or girl). Subjects then completed two questionnaires designed to measure their interest in infants. Results showed, consistent with the significance of alloparental care in human evolution, that nulliparous adults have an attentional bias toward infants. Results also showed that women's interest in and attentional bias towards infants were stronger and more stable than men's. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that, due to their central role in infant care, women have evolved a greater and more stable sensitivity to infants. The results also show that eye movements can be successfully used to assess individual differences in interest in infants. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据