4.4 Article

Social learning across the life cycle: cultural knowledge acquisition for honey collection among the Jenu Kuruba, India

期刊

EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 460-470

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.008

关键词

Social learning; Overlapping generations; Knowledge acquisition

资金

  1. NSF [BSC-0726612]
  2. ANR-French National Research Agency [ANR-05-PADD-0XX]
  3. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accounting for age-dependent patterns of knowledge transmission is critical for understanding cultural evolution in age-structured populations. Cultural evolution theory predicts which social learning biases we expect people to use, but much less often when during a person's life cycle different social learning biases will be used. By measuring knowledge and skill variation among age cohorts, it is possible to infer how people socially acquire different types of knowledge at different ages. We use this strategy among the Jenu Kuruba, a tribal community in South India. We document the accumulation of local knowledge required for collecting wild honey among 71 children and 125 adults from five communities. Combining quantitative measurements of knowledge with measures of four honey-collecting skills and self-reported data on learning age, we infer patterns of social learning across the lifecycle. We find that (1) most knowledge related to honey collecting is acquired by the early 20s, and later social learning mainly functions to update information; (2) the eldest cohort has the highest average explicit knowledge, although the most knowledgeable or skilled individuals do not always belong to the most elderly cohort; (3) length of learning can be affected by age-dependent trade-offs of costs and benefits to learners; and (4) children tend to learn from parents, but individuals use other demonstrators later in life. These results have implications for current models of cultural evolution. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据