4.5 Review

GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF SKELETAL EVOLUTION IN EUROPEAN LAKE AND STREAM STICKLEBACK

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 1792-1805

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12390

关键词

Effect size; Gasterosteus aculeatus; lateral plate; QTL mapping; RAD sequencing; vertebral number

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_146208/1, PZ00P3_126391/1, CRSII3_136293]
  2. Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft (FAG) Basel
  3. Research Fund of the University of Basel
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_146208, PZ00P3_126391, CRSII3_136293] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in genomic techniques are greatly facilitating the study of molecular signatures of selection in diverging natural populations. Connecting these signatures to phenotypes under selection remains challenging, but benefits from dissections of the genetic architecture of adaptive divergence. We here perform quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using 488 F2 individuals and 2011 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to explore the genetic architecture of skeletal divergence in a lake-stream stickleback system from Central Europe. We find QTLs for gill raker, snout, and head length, vertebral number, and the extent of lateral plating (plate number and height). Although two large-effect loci emerge, QTL effect sizes are generally small. Examining the neighborhood of the QTL-linked SNPs identifies several genes involved in bone formation, which emerge as strong candidate genes for skeletal evolution. Finally, we use SNP data from the natural source populations to demonstrate that some SNPs linked to QTLs in our cross also exhibit striking allele frequency differences in the wild, suggesting a causal role of these QTLs in adaptive population divergence. Our study paves the way for comparative analyses across other (lake-stream) stickleback populations, and for functional investigations of the candidate genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据