4.5 Article

THE CHALLENGE OF SPECIES DELIMITATION AT THE EXTREMES: DIVERSIFICATION WITHOUT MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE IN PHILIPPINE SUN SKINKS

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 67, 期 12, 页码 3556-3572

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12219

关键词

BP&P; cryptic species; Eutropis; GMYC; lizard; morphometrics

资金

  1. University of Kansas (KU) Panorama fund
  2. KU Office of Graduate Studies Doctoral Student research fund
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB 0743491]
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0743491] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An accurate understanding of species diversity is essential to studies across a wide range of biological subdisciplines. However, delimiting species remains challenging in evolutionary radiations where morphological diversification is rapid and accompanied by little genetic differentiation or when genetic lineage divergence is not accompanied by morphological change. We investigate the utility of a variety of recently developed approaches to examine genetic and morphological diversity, and delimit species in a morphologically conserved group of Southeast Asian lizards. We find that species diversity is vastly underestimated in this unique evolutionary radiation, and find an extreme case where extensive genetic divergence among lineages has been accompanied by little to no differentiation in external morphology. Although we note that different conclusions can be drawn when species are delimited using molecular phylogenetics, coalescent-based methods, or morphological data, it is clear that the use of a pluralistic approach leads to a more comprehensive appraisal of biodiversity, and greater appreciation for processes of diversification in this biologically important geographic region. Similarly, our approach demonstrates how recently developed methodologies can be used to obtain robust estimates of species limits in nonadaptive or cryptic evolutionary radiations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据