4.5 Article

GENOMIC REGIONS WITH A HISTORY OF DIVERGENT SELECTION AFFECT FITNESS OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN TWO BUTTERFLY SPECIES

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 66, 期 7, 页码 2167-2181

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01587.x

关键词

Divergent selection; hybridization; introgression; population genomics; speciation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DDIG-1011173, IOS-1021873, DEB-1050355, DEB-0614223, DEB-1050947, DEB-1020509, DEB-1050726, DBI-0701757, DEB-1050149]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [1050947] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1050149, 1050355] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Speciation is the process by which reproductively isolated lineages arise, and is one of the fundamental means by which the diversity of life increases. Whereas numerous studies have documented an association between ecological divergence and reproductive isolation, relatively little is known about the role of natural selection in genome divergence during the process of speciation. Here, we use genome-wide DNA sequences and Bayesian models to test the hypothesis that loci under divergent selection between two butterfly species (Lycaeides idas and L. melissa) also affect fitness in an admixed population. Locus-specific measures of genetic differentiation between L. idas and L. melissa and genomic introgression in hybrids varied across the genome. The most differentiated genetic regions were characterized by elevated L. idas ancestry in the admixed population, which occurs in L. idas-like habitat, consistent with the hypothesis that local adaptation contributes to speciation. Moreover, locus-specific measures of genetic differentiation (a metric of divergent selection) were positively associated with extreme genomic introgression (a metric of hybrid fitness). Interestingly, concordance of differentiation and introgression was only partial. We discuss multiple, complementary explanations for this partial concordance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据