4.5 Article

LATE PALEOZOIC FUSULINOIDEAN GIGANTISM DRIVEN BY ATMOSPHERIC HYPEROXIA

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 2929-2939

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01626.x

关键词

Body size; Carboniferous; Cope's Rule; foraminifera; oxygen; Permian

资金

  1. American Chemical Society [50639-UR8]
  2. Stanford University Vice Provost for Undergraduate Research
  3. Stanford University
  4. NSF [1054025]
  5. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1054025] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric hyperoxia, with pO2 in excess of 30%, has long been hypothesized to account for late Paleozoic (360250 million years ago) gigantism in numerous higher taxa. However, this hypothesis has not been evaluated statistically because comprehensive size data have not been compiled previously at sufficient temporal resolution to permit quantitative analysis. In this study, we test the hyperoxia-gigantism hypothesis by examining the fossil record of fusulinoidean foraminifers, a dramatic example of protistan gigantism with some individuals exceeding 10 cm in length and exceeding their relatives by six orders of magnitude in biovolume. We assembled and examined comprehensive regional and global, species-level datasets containing 270 and 1823 species, respectively. A statistical model of size evolution forced by atmospheric pO2 is conclusively favored over alternative models based on random walks or a constant tendency toward size increase. Moreover, the ratios of volume to surface area in the largest fusulinoideans are consistent in magnitude and trend with a mathematical model based on oxygen transport limitation. We further validate the hyperoxia-gigantism model through an examination of modern foraminiferal species living along a measured gradient in oxygen concentration. These findings provide the first quantitative confirmation of a direct connection between Paleozoic gigantism and atmospheric hyperoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据