4.5 Article

ASYMMETRIC RESPONSE PATTERNS TO SUBSPECIES-SPECIFIC SONG DIFFERENCES IN ALLOPATRY AND PARAPATRY IN THE GRAY-BREASTED WOOD-WREN

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 64, 期 12, 页码 3537-3548

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01089.x

关键词

Behavioral barrier; character displacement; cultural transmission; Henicorhina leucophrys; hybridization; song variation

资金

  1. Gates Cambridge Trust, St. John's College
  2. American Ornithologists' Union
  3. Groningen University
  4. Marco Polo Fonds
  5. Dr. L.A. Bumastichting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Song divergence between closely related taxa may play a critical role in the evolutionary processes of speciation and hybridization. We explored song variation between two Ecuadorian subspecies of the gray-breasted wood-wren (Henicorhina leucophrys) and tested the impact of song divergence on response behaviors. Songs were significantly different between the two subspecies, even between two parapatric populations 10 km apart. Playback experiments revealed an asymmetric response pattern to these divergent subspecies specific songs; one subspecies responded more to songs of its own subspecies than to the other subspecies' songs, whereas the second responded equally strongly to songs of both subspecies. While song parameters revealed a mixed pattern of divergence between allopatric and parapatric populations, the majority of spectral characteristics showed increased divergence in parapatry, suggestive of character displacement. This increased song divergence in parapatry appeared to affect behavioral responses to playback as discriminating responses were most prominent in parapatry and against parapatric songs. The clear behavioral impact of subspecies-specific song differences supports a potential role for song as an acoustic barrier to gene flow. The asymmetric nature of the responses suggests that song divergence could affect the direction of gene flow and the position of the subspecies-specific transition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据