4.5 Review

ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF GALAPAGOS LAVA LIZARDS (TROPIDURIDAE: MICROLOPHUS): SPECIES DIVERSITY AND COLONIZATION OF THE ARCHIPELAGO

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 1606-1626

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00617.x

关键词

Galapagos; lizards; mitochondrial DNA; molecular timing of colonization; nuclear DNA; oceanic islands; phylogeny

资金

  1. BYU
  2. Department of Biology
  3. M. L. Bean Life Science Museum
  4. Larsen Scholarship
  5. B. F. Harrison Scholarship
  6. Society of Systematic Biologists
  7. National Science Foundation [DEB 0309111, EF 0334966]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lava lizards (Microlophus) are distributed throughout the Galapagos Archipelago, and consist of radiations derived from two independent colonizations. The Eastern Radiation includes M. bivittatus and M. habeli endemic to San Cristobal and Marchena Islands. The Western Radiation includes five to seven historically recognized species distributed across almost the entire Archipelago. We combine dense geographic sampling and multilocus sequence data to estimate a phylogenetic hypothesis for the Western Radiation, to delimit species boundaries in this radiation, and to estimate a time frame for colonization events. Our phylogenetic hypothesis rejects two earlier topologies for the Western Radiation and paraphyly of M. albemarlensis, while providing strong support for single colonizations on each island. The colonization history implied by our phylogeny is consistent with general expectations of an east-to-west route predicted by the putative age of island groups, and prevailing ocean currents in the Archipelago. Additionally, combined evidence suggests that M. indefatigabilis from Santa Fe should be recognized as a full species. Finally, molecular divergence estimates suggest that the two colonization events likely occurred on the oldest existing islands, and the Western Radiation represents a recent radiation that, in most cases, has produced species that are considerably younger than the islands they inhabit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据