4.5 Article

POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC VARIATION INPERFORMANCE ON EIGHT HOSTS IN THE PEA APHID COMPLEX

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 62, 期 10, 页码 2508-2524

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00468.x

关键词

Acyrthosiphon pisum; ecological speciation; evolution of specialization; performance; reciprocal transfer experiment

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [D19263, BB/E010857/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [D19263, BB/E010857/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [cpb010001] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/E010857/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. NERC [cpb010001] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytophagous insects frequently use multiple host-plant species leading to the evolution of specialized host-adapted populations and sometimes eventually to speciation. Some insects are confronted with a large number of host-plant species, which may provide complex routes of gene flow between host-adapted populations. The pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) attacks a broad range of plants in the Fabaceae and it is known that populations on Trifolium pratense and Medicago sativa can be highly specialized at exploiting these species. To find out whether adaptation to a broad range of co-occurring hosts has occurred, we tested the performance of pea aphid clones collected from eight host-plant genera on all of these plants in a reciprocal transfer experiment. We provide evidence for pervasive host-plant specialization. The high performance of all aphid clones on Vicia faba suggests that this host plant could be a site of gene flow between different populations that could limit further host-associated divergence. The genetic variance in host-plant usage was partitioned into within- and among-population components, which represent different levels of host adaptation. Little evidence of within-population trade-offs in performance on different plant species was found.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据