4.3 Article

Effect of Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction Pretreatment on Myocardium in Sepsis Rats

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2939307

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Program of Zhongshan [2016B1005]
  2. Program from Guangdong Province Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine [20161264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction (XFZYD), the classical recipe for promoting blood circulation by removing blood stasis, has been used in China for a long history clinically. XFZYD has been found to improve cardiac function through reducing inflammation. However, the effect of XFZYD on myocardial apoptosis remains unclear. Herein, we investigated the mechanism of XFZYD preconditioning on myocardial injury in sepsis rats. The rats were treated with XFZYD one week, followed with intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS: 10mg/kg) to induce sepsis. Pretreatment with XFZYD could reverse the effects of LPS-induced decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and increased heart rate (HR). XFZYD decreased the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in serum or in heart. TUNEL staining revealed that the apoptotic index of XFZYD was significantly lower compared with the LPS group (P<0.05). Western blot results showed that the high doses of pretreatment XFZYD group can reduce the Bax expression of myocardial tissue in rats (P<0.05, P<0.01). The expression of Bcl-2 in XFZYD group was significantly higher than that in the LPS group (P<0.01), while the expression of caspase-3 in treatment group was significantly lower than that in the LPS group only after 12 h modeling (P<0.01). In addition, caspase-3 activity in rat cardiomyocytes of XFZYD-treated animals was significantly decreased. These findings suggest that pretreatment with XFZYD exerts a protective effect in the myocardium of septic rats by inhibiting myocardial cell apoptosis and antioxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据