4.6 Article

Sex, Nativity, and Disability in Older Mexican Americans

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 63, 期 12, 页码 2596-2600

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13827

关键词

nativity; sex; Mexican born; US born; ADL; mobility limitation; older Mexican Americans

资金

  1. Retirement Research Foundation, at 139th American Public Health Association Annual Meeting & Exposition, Washington, DC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of nativity and sex on activities of daily living (ADLs) and mobility limitations in older Mexican Americans. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiological Study of the Elderly (Hispanic EPESE) (2004-05). PARTICIPANTS: Noninstitutionalized Mexican Americans aged 75 and older (N = 2,069; 56.3% U.S. born, 43.7% Mexican born). MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported medical conditions (arthritis, cancer, diabetes mellitus, stroke, heart attack, hip fracture), ADLs, and gross mobility function. RESULTS: The prevalence of ADL limitation was 32.9% in U.S.-born participants and 33.9% in Mexican-born participants of mobility limitation was 56.6% in U.S.-born participants and 55.6% in Mexican-born participants. Mexican-born participants tended to report less ADL limitation (odds ratio (OR) = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.59-1.05)) after controlling for sociodemographic variables and medical conditions. They were also less likely to report mobility limitation (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.48-0.86) after controlling for all covariates. There was a significant effect of the interaction between nativity and sex (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.24-0.74) on ADL limitation, suggesting that Mexican-born men were less disabled than U.S.-born men, whereas the opposite was true for women. No significant interaction between nativity and sex was found for mobility limitation. CONCLUSION: Mexican-born men were less disabled than their U.S.-born counterparts, and Mexican-born women were more likely to report disability than Mexican-born men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据