4.3 Review

Recent Highlights of Metabolomics in Chinese Medicine Syndrome Research

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2013/402159

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of State [90709019, 81173500, 81373930, 81302905, 81102556, 81202639]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011BAI03B03, 2011BAI03B06, 2011BAI03B08]
  3. Key Science and Technology Program of Heilongjiang Province, China [GC06C501, GA08C303, GA06C30101]
  4. Foundation of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine [201209]
  5. National Key Subject of Drug Innovation [2009 ZX09502-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chinese medicine syndrome (CMS, ZHENG in Chinese) is an understanding of the regularity of disease occurrence and development as well as a certain stage of a comprehensive response of patients with body condition. However, because of the complexity of CMS and the limitation of present investigation method, the research for deciphering the scientific basis and systematic features of CMS is difficult to go further. Metabolomics enables mapping of early biochemical changes in disease and hence provides an opportunity to develop predictive biomarkers. Moreover, its method and design resemble those of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) which focuses on human disease via the integrity of close relationship between body and syndromes. In the systemic context, metabolomics has a convergence with TCM syndrome; therefore it could provide useful tools for exploring essence of CMS disease, facilitating personalized TCM, and will help to in-depth understand CMS. The integration of the metabolomics and CMS aspects will give promise to bridge the gap between Chinese and Western medicine and help catch the traditional features of CMS. In this paper, particular attention will be paid to the past successes in applications of robust metabolomic approaches to contribute to low-molecular-weight metabolites (biomarkers) discovery in CMS research and development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据