A Randomized Comparison of a Single-incision Midurethral Sling and a Transobturator Midurethral Sling in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: Results of 12-mo Follow-up

Background: Midurethral sling procedures have become the prime surgical treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Single-incision mini-slings (SIMS) potentially offer similar efficacy with reduced morbidity. This international multicenter trial compared the efficacy and morbidity of a SIMS (MiniArc) and a transobturator standard midurethral sling (SMUS) (Monarc). Objective: To compare subjective and objective cure, morbidity, and surgery-related discomfort following SIMS and transobturator SMUS. Design, setting, and participants: Prospective randomized controlled trial with an initial follow-up period of 12 mo. Women with symptomatic SUI were eligible. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Primary outcome was subjective cure, defined as an improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Coprimary outcome was the mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (0-100) during 3 d after surgery. Secondary outcomes were objective cure based on the cough stress test (CST), disease-specific quality of life determined by the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) score, surgical parameters, and physical performance during recovery. Analysis was by intent to treat. Differences between the MiniArc and Monarc groups on dichotomous variables were chi-square tested and presented as relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. We hypothesized that MiniArc was noninferior to Monarc concerning subjective cure and superior concerning postoperative pain. Results and limitations: We randomized 97 women to MiniArc and 96 to Monarc. At 12-mo follow-up, subjective cure was 83% following MiniArc and 86% following Monarc (p = 0.46). Objective cure was 89% following MiniArc and 91% following Monarc (p = 0.65). The mean pain VAS score during the first three postoperative days was 9 following MiniArc and 22 following Monarc (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.01). Conclusions: At 1-yr follow-up, MiniArc was noninferior to Monarc with respect to subjective and objective cure and superior with respect to postoperative pain. Patient summary: This 1-yr randomized clinical trial showed that MiniArc, a single-incision midurethral sling, is noninferior to Monarc, a transobturator sling, with respect to cure and superior with respect to pain and recovery. (C) 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.