4.6 Article

Improved Survival in a Cohort of Trial Participants with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Demonstrates the Need for Updated Prognostic Nomograms

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 300-306

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.12.029

关键词

Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Survival Prognostic factors; Prognostic nomogram

资金

  1. Swiss Cancer League [BIL KLS-02592-02-2010]
  2. Prostate Cancer Foundation (Santa Monica)
  3. Prostate Cancer UK
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. Experimental Cancer Medical Centre Grant for Cancer Research UK
  6. UK Department of Health
  7. JJ
  8. Sanofi Aventis
  9. Medivation
  10. Astellas
  11. AstraZeneca
  12. Dendreon
  13. Genentech
  14. Pfizer
  15. GSK
  16. Cancer Research UK [13239] Funding Source: researchfish
  17. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2008-22-001] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Median overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) was 13-16 mo in the predocetaxel era. Prognostic nomograms for survival estimation in CRPC were constructed prior to the introduction of docetaxel and other novel treatments. Objective: To examine whether prognostic models still accurately reflect survival in a large cohort of trial participants. Design, setting, and participants: Survival analysis of 442 men with CRPC sequentially treated in clinical trials at our institution from June 2003 to December 2011. Outcome measures and statistical analysis: Predicted survival by Halabi and Smaletz nomograms was compared to observed survival. Cox model multivariate analysis (MVA) used variables at referral, including performance status (PS); levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), haemoglobin (Hb), and albumin; presence of visceral disease, and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Results and limitations: From point of referral, chemotherapy-naive patients had a median OS of 30.6 mo(95% confidence interval [CI], 27.6-36.5 mo). In contrast, predicted survival using the Halabi and Smaletz models was 21 and 18 mo, respectively. In these patients, poor PS, lower Hb level, and increasing LDH level were the strongest predictors in the MVA. In patients referred after chemotherapy, survival from referral was 17.5 mo (95% CI, 16.0-19.5 mo) and increasing LDH level and presence of visceral metastases were the strongest predictors of survival. Median OS from diagnosis of CRPC was 40.7 mo in the overall cohort (95% CI, 36.8-44.0 mo). Clinical trial participation was safe, with low mortality rate. This cohort of men participated in phase 1, 2 and 3 trials and expanded access programs; their data may not reflect survival in all CRPC patients. Conclusions: Due to the impact of highly effective novel therapies on survival, prognostic nomograms in current use require revalidation regarding their ability to predict survival in CRPC. (C) 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据