4.5 Article

The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

期刊

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 400-410

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2021-1

关键词

Lumbar spinal stenosis; Biomechanical effect; Intervertebral foramen; Segmental spinal canal length; Intervertebral disc space

资金

  1. Medtronic Inc
  2. NIH [R21AR057989]
  3. China Scholarship Council [2009637094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the biomechanical effect of the X-Stop device on the intervertebral foramen (IVF) and segmental spinal canal length (SSCL), as well as the intervertebral disc space at the implanted and the adjacent segments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Eight elderly patients with LSS, scheduled for X-stop implantation, were CT or MRI scanned to construct 3D vertebral models (L2-S1). Before and after the surgery, each patient was also imaged using a dual-fluoroscopic image system during weight-bearing standing and maximum extension-flexion. The positions of the vertebrae were then determined using an established 2D-3D model matching method. The data revealed that the postoperative IVF area was significantly increased by 32.9% (or 32 mm(2)) (p < 0.05) and the IVF width was increased by 24.4% (or 1.1 mm, p = 0.06) during extension, but with minimal change in standing and flexion. The IVF heights were significantly (p < 0.05) increased at standing by 1.2 mm and extension by 1.8 mm, but not at flexion. The SSCL were significantly (p < 0.05) increased at extension by 1.2 mm, but not at standing and flexion. Anterior disc space of the implanted level was significantly decreased from 8.0 to 6.6 mm during standing. The X-Stop implantation efficiently enlarged the IVF area in the elderly patients with LSS at the operated level with little biomechanical effect immediately on the superior and inferior adjacent levels. However, it reduced the anterior disc space at the implanted level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据