4.6 Article

Drug resistance beyond extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: individual patient data meta-analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 169-179

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00136312

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stop TB Department of the World Health Organization through USAID
  2. State of California from the Centers for Disease Control Cooperative Agreement Funds
  3. Mexico (Veracruz) from the Mexican Secretariat of Health
  4. National Institutes of Health of the United States [A135969, K01TW000001]
  5. Wellcome Trust [176W009]
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [55000632]
  7. Mexican Council of Science and Technology [SEP 2004-001-47499, FOSSIS 2005-2 (14475), 87332]
  8. South Africa from the South African Medical Research Council
  9. Fonds de Recherche en Sante de Quebec
  10. European Community [FP7-223681]
  11. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  12. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The broadest pattern of tuberculosis (TB) drug resistance for which a consensus definition exists is extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB. It is not known if additional drug resistance portends worsened patient outcomes. This study compares treatment outcomes of XDR-TB patients with and without additional resistance in order to explore the need for a new definition. Individual patient data on XDR-TB outcomes were included in a meta-analysis comparing outcomes between XDR alone and three nonmutually exclusive XDR-TB patient groups: XDR plus resistance to all the second-line injectables (sli) and capreomycin and kanamycin/amikacin (XDR+2sli) XDR plus resistance to second-line injectables and to more than one group 4 drug, i.e. ethionamide/protionamide, cydoserine/terizidone or para-aminosalicylic acid (XDR+sliG4) and XDR+sliG4 plus resistance to ethambutol and/or pyrazinamide (XDR+sliG4EZ). Of 405 XDR-TB cases, 301 were XDR alone, 68 XDR+2sli, 48 XDR+sliG4 and 42 XDR+sliG4EZ. In multivariate analysis, the odds of cure were significantly lower in XDR+2sli (adjusted OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8) compared to XDR alone, while odds of failure and death were higher in all XDR patients with additional resistance (adjusted OR 2.6-2.8). Patients with additional resistance beyond XDR-TB showed poorer outcomes. Limitations in availability, accuracy and reproducibility of current drug susceptibility testing methods preclude the adoption of a useful definition beyond the one currently used for XDR-TB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据