4.6 Review

The risk of tuberculosis in transplant candidates and recipients: a TBNET consensus statement

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 990-1013

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00000712

关键词

Guideline; management; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; transplantation; tuberculosis

资金

  1. CNCSIS- UEFISCSU [PNII-IDEI 1447/2008]
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A900_1122] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [SRF-2009-02-07] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [MC_UP_A900_1122] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tuberculosis (TB) is a possible complication of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The identification of candidates for preventive chemotherapy is an effective intervention to protect transplant recipients with latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis from progressing to active disease. The best available proxy for diagnosing latent infection with M. tuberculosis is the identification of an adaptive immune response by the tuberculin skin test or an interferon-gamma based ex vivo assay. Risk assessment in transplant recipients for the development of TB depends on, among other factors, the locally expected underlying prevalence of infection with M. tuberculosis in the target population. In areas of high prevalence, preventive chemotherapy for all transplant recipients may be justified without immunodiagnostic testing while in areas of medium and low prevalence, preventive chemotherapy should only be offered to candidates with positive M. tuberculosis-specific immune responses. The diagnosis of TB in transplant recipients can be challenging. Treatment of TB is often difficult due to substantial interactions between anti-TB drugs and immunosuppressive medications. This management guideline summarises current knowledge on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of TB related to solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and provides an expert consensus on questions where scientific evidence is still lacking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据