4.6 Article

Nuclear survivin in pN2 nonsmall cell lung cancer: prognostic and clinical implications

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 127-133

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00068708

关键词

Nonsmall cell lung cancer; nuclear; pathological N2; prognosis; survivin

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [19591611, 18790986]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer (N2-NSCLC) represent heterogeneous groups. Survivin is a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis family. If N2-NSCLC patients could be stratified, based on survivin expression and/or its relation to cell cycle proteins, into homogeneous subgroups, certain therapies could be selected for those patients. Survivin expression in 78 surgically resected primary pathological N2-NSCLC tumours was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Relationships of survivin expression to overall survival, clinical features and expression of six cell cycle-related proteins (pRb, cyclin D1, p16(INK4A), p53, p21(Waf1) and Ki-67) were analysed. Nuclear survivin and the number of mediastinal lymph node (LN) stations were independent prognostic factors. The patient group with combined negative survivin/single mediastinal LN station were the most favourable prognostic group, and was related to the clinical nodal factor. Indeed, patients with negative survivin/low Ki-67 labelling indices had the best survival, especially in nonsquamous histopathology. The current authors conclude that nuclear survivin is strongly related to lymph node metastasis and proliferative potentials in pathological N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer patients. Pre-operative N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with combined negative nuclear survivin and a single mediastinal lymph node station, or low proliferative indices, particularly in clinical N0-1 disease and nonsquamous histopathology, respectively, are expected to have a favourable post-operative prognosis and may be candidates for primary resection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据