4.6 Article

Serial viral infections in infants with recurrent respiratory illnesses

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 314-320

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00161907

关键词

infant; respiratory virus; rhinovirus; virus persistence; virus strain; wheezing

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR025011, UL1 RR025011-01, 1UL1RR025011] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL061879-02, R01 HL61879, P01 HL070831-01, P01 HL070831, P01 HL70831] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To better understand the viral aetiology of recurrent and prolonged illnesses, nasal secretions were prospectively collected from 285 infants at increased risk of developing asthma. Of these, 27 infants had recurrent (at least five) moderate-to-severe respiratory illnesses (MSIs). The viral aetiology of the 150 MSIs and 86 scheduled visits was analysed by molecular diagnostics. The demographic and clinical data were compared with infants who had 0-4 MSIs. Frequently ill infants had higher exposure to other children and more wheezing illnesses than less symptomatic children. Viruses were detected in 136 (91 %) out of 150 MSIs, 14 (67%) out of 21 mild illnesses and 29 (45%) out of 65 asymptomatic visits. Human rhinovirus was the most common aetiological agent (61, 43 and 35% in MSIs, mild illnesses and asymptomatic visits, respectively). Mixed viral infections were generally associated with more severe illnesses (27, 0 and 5%, respectively). Among the 27 frequently ill infants, only eight (5.3%) out of 150 MSIs were prolonged (>= 2 weeks duration). Considering all samples, detection of the same virus strain >= 2 weeks apart was unusual (5.3% of all 244 positive findings). Human rhinovirus infections occur early, pervasively and repetitively in these high-risk infants. Infants with prolonged or recurrent respiratory illnesses most often have a series of infections rather than persistent infection with one virus strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据