4.7 Article

Trigeminal neuralgia: Assessment with T2 VISTA and FLAIR VISTA fusion imaging

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 2633-2639

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2216-1

关键词

Trigeminal neuralgia; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neurovascular compression; Microvascular decompression; Multiplanar reformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the neurovascular compression (NVC) in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) using T2 VISTA and FLAIR VISTA fusion imaging. Sixty-six consecutive patients with TN who underwent MR imaging at 3-T between April 2008 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) of T2 VISTA and FLAIR VISTA fusion imaging were used for image interpretation. The frequency of vascular contact, the segment of compression and the type of vessel were compared between the ipsilateral symptomatic side and the contralateral asymptomatic side. The frequency of vascular contact on the ipsilateral side and the contralateral side were 95.5% (63/66) and 74.2% (49/66), respectively. The frequency of indentation on the ipsilateral side and contralateral side were 74.2% (49/66) and 21.2% (14/66), and showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and odds ratio were 77.8%, 71.4% and 10.7, respectively. There were no significant differences in the involved segment or type of vessel between the ipsilateral side and contralateral side. MPR of T2 VISTA and FLAIR VISTA fusion imaging is useful in the detection of NVC in patients with TN. Vascular indentation can predict the presence of symptoms in patients with TN. Key Points aEuro cent Fusion MRI with multiplanar reconstruction can detect neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia aEuro cent Vascular indentation can predict the presence of symptoms in patients with trigeminal neuralgia aEuro cent In patients with trigeminal neuralgia, neurovascular indentation is commoner on the symptomatic side.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据