4.7 Article

Accelerating regional atrophy rates in the progression from normal aging to Alzheimer's disease

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 2826-2833

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1512-5

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Atrophy; Image processing.; Computer-assisted

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0601846] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10123] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0601846] Funding Source: Medline
  4. MRC [G0601846] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated progression of atrophy in vivo, in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We included 64 patients with AD, 44 with MCI and 34 controls with serial MRI examinations (interval 1.8 +/- 0.7 years). A nonlinear registration algorithm (fluid) was used to calculate atrophy rates in six regions: frontal, medial temporal, temporal (extramedial), parietal, occipital lobes and insular cortex. In MCI, the highest atrophy rate was observed in the medial temporal lobe, comparable with AD. AD patients showed even higher atrophy rates in the extramedial temporal lobe. Additionally, atrophy rates in frontal, parietal and occipital lobes were increased. Cox proportional hazard models showed that all regional atrophy rates predicted conversion to AD. Hazard ratios varied between 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-6.2) for occipital atrophy and 15.8 (95% CI = 3.5-71.8) for medial temporal lobe atrophy. In conclusion, atrophy spreads through the brain with development of AD. MCI is marked by temporal lobe atrophy. In AD, atrophy rate in the extramedial temporal lobe was even higher. Moreover, atrophy rates also accelerated in parietal, frontal, insular and occipital lobes. Finally, in nondemented elderly, medial temporal lobe atrophy was most predictive of progression to AD, demonstrating the involvement of this region in the development of AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据